NONGQAISouth Africa’s National Security MagazineEstablished in 1907
DONATE

All Articles


996 articles

Duty, Politics, and Retrospection: A Reflection on Security and Accountability Policing and Politics — A Thin Line
1939 - 1945: The Wartime SA Police

Duty, Politics, and Retrospection: A Reflection on Security and Accountability Policing and Politics — A Thin Line

This article explores the fraught intersection of policing and politics in South African history, tracing a cycle of duty, disloyalty, and moral reckoning from World War II through the democratic transition of the 1990s. It highlights the roles of key Security Branch officers under the Smuts government, including covert operatives like Captain Jan Taillard, and reflects on the ideological tensions that shaped their careers. Through the lens of Major GE Diedericks’ internment of BJ Vorster and the later abandonment of the South African Police during CODESA negotiations, the narrative examines how political shifts repeatedly left loyal officers vulnerable. The article argues for a retrospective moral accounting of the policeman’s role, invoking the Nuremberg Principles and emphasizing the need to honour integrity amid political storms. It concludes with reflections on South Africa’s intelligence community and the enduring lessons of service, sacrifice, and historical memory.

Gambling and the Sport of Kings
Functions of the SA Police

Gambling and the Sport of Kings

Hennie Heymans, a former policeman with the District Raiding Squad at SAP Wentworth, recounts his experiences at Clairwood Race Course in apartheid-era South Africa, where he performed duties during horse racing events. Stationed in the Silver Circle, he observed the grandeur of the races, the diverse crowds, and the curious practice of Indian patrons betting on his police number. Despite his Dutch Reformed Church upbringing, which frowned upon gambling, Heymans enjoyed the spectacle of the horses but noted the irony of police arresting players of Crown & Anchor, a dice game, for illegal gambling at the racecourse. While horse racing was a regulated, socially accepted activity, Crown & Anchor was deemed an illicit game of chance, leading to arrests and confiscations. The article reflects on the cultural and legal distinctions between the prestigious “Sport of Kings” and stigmatized informal gambling, questioning the fine line between skill and chance.